I expect my family to be taken care of in the very best way possible, and I don't feel like that's happening when you're balking at my claims to a therapist and you are setting limits on that.Her expectation is for the best possible care, as defined by the patient, exempt from limits imposed by the insurance company. Without debating the merits of her claim (I don't doubt them at all, BTW) therapy still has to be paid for by someone. Here are a few thorny questions a public plan that doesn't have to turn a profit will have to answer:
- Will a therapist who treats patients "in the very best way possible" be legally compelled to service this level of demand?
- Who decides what constitutes "best?"
- What if reimbursement is, over time, inadequate and said therapists refuse to accept the public plan?
- Will coverage be denied for some and not for others? On what basis? Who decides? Why will they be better allocators than private markets? Will it cost less? Why?
- If some future Congress requires that a public plan accommodate this expectation, will taxpayers or policyholders be required to assume any excess costs?
- Are these expectations price inflationary?
Mr. President, it won't be easy but please end the employer health care exclusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment